GeForce GTX 295 vs TITAN X Pascal
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
596
TITAN X Pascal
+1740%
10970
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Aug 2016
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
480.4GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
28
240
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
224
28
ROPs
96
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
171.5 GFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.97 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
342.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
289W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GP102
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
GP102-400-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
