GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 94% (2000MHz vs 1032MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
1585
Arc A350
+93%
3072
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 600
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
980 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
768
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
66.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
1.585 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
66.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
25W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
DG2-128
GK106-240-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
