GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Boost Clock1032MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 134.4GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (134W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
+47%
1585
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
1078
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 600
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
980 MHz
Base Clock
-
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
768
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
384 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
66.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
1.585 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS
66.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
134W
TDP
375W
300 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
GF100
GK106-240-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
