GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs H200 SXM 141 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 141GB VRAM H200 SXM 141 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 700W)
H200 SXM 141 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 92% (1980MHz vs 1032MHz)
More VRAM (141GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 144.2GB/s)
16128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
1585
H200 SXM 141 GB
+4121%
66910
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2024
GeForce 600
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
980 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
1980 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
141GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
192bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
132
768
Shading Units
16896
64
TMUs
528
24
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
384 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
66.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1045 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
267.6 TFLOPS
1.585 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.91 TFLOPS
66.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.45 TFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
700W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1100 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
GH100
GK106-240-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
80 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
9.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
