GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Lower TDP (134W vs 300W)
H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (1550MHz vs 1032MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
1585
H3C XG310
+50%
2381
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2020
GeForce 600
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
980 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
768
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
24
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
66.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
1.585 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
66.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
DG1
GK106-240-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
Unknown
221 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
