Home Comparison GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs FirePro W600

GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 195W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition +323%
3250
FirePro W600
768

Graphics Card

Apr 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1006 MHz
Base Clock
-
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
1536
Shading Units
512
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

195W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net