GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 360 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1058MHz vs 1050MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (85W vs 195W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
+101%
3250
Radeon R9 360 OEM
1613
Graphics Card
Apr 2013
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 600
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1006 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
1536
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
195W
TDP
85W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Tobago
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3