Home Comparison GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition vs Radeon R5 A320

GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition vs Radeon R5 A320

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Radeon R5 A320 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock825MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition +318%
2209
Radeon R5 A320
528

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Jan 2015
GeForce 600M
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
825 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
1536
Shading Units
320
128
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
92.03 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.50 GTexel/s
2.209 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
528.0 GFLOPS
92.03 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

122W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Jet
N13E-GTX2-A2
GPU Variant
Jet PRO (216-0856040)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.170
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
© 2025 - TopCPU.net