Home Comparison GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon Instinct MI350X

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon Instinct MI350X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI350X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 1000W)
Radeon Instinct MI350X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 103% (2200MHz vs 1085MHz)
More VRAM (288GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (8.19TB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
15744 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1389
Radeon Instinct MI350X +5090%
72090

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Jan 2025
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1020 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
8.19TB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
256
640
Shading Units
16384
40
TMUs
1024
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2252.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
576.7 TFLOPS
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
72.09 TFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.09 TFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
1000W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
CDNA Next
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
CDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
3 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
185 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net