GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1455MHz vs 1150MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 965M
2355
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh
+184%
6705
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 965M
1800
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh
+328%
7705
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 965M
798
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh
+355%
3634
Graphics Card
Jan 2016
Release Date
Mar 2020
GeForce 900M
Generation
GeForce 20 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
935 MHz
Base Clock
1260 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
352.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
36
1024
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
36.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
93.12 GPixel/s
73.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
209.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.41 TFLOPS
2.355 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.705 TFLOPS
73.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
209.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
115W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206S
GPU Name
TU106B
N16E-GR-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
