GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 980 Ti and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 980 Ti 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1076MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
+506%
6060
FireStream 9250
1000
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 900
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1076 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
2816
Shading Units
800
176
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
103.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
189.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
6.060 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
189.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM200
GPU Name
RV770
GM200-310-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1