GeForce GTX TITAN X vs GeForce GTS 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN X and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX TITAN X 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock1089MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX TITAN X
+1628%
6691
GeForce GTS 250
387
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX TITAN X
+395%
5418
GeForce GTS 250
1094
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1089 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
3072
Shading Units
128
192
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
104.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
209.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
6.691 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
209.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM200
GPU Name
G92B
GM200-400-A1
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
