GeForce MX250 vs FirePro W6150M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
797
FirePro W6150M
+107%
1651
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX250
1079
FirePro W6150M
+34%
1452
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce MX
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
Emerald
-
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
