GeForce MX250 vs GeForce GT 320M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
360 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
+1403%
797
GeForce GT 320M
53
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2010
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
3
384
Shading Units
24
24
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.80 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
10W
TDP
23W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
GT216
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
