GeForce MX250 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1335MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
797
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+414%
4101
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX250
1079
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+360%
4973
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce MX250
222
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+937%
2304
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+1108%
870
OctaneBench
GeForce MX250
22
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+404%
111
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2019
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
TU116
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
