GeForce MX250 vs GeForce GTX 765M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 765M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1038MHz vs 863MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)
GeForce GTX 765M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
797
GeForce GTX 765M
+66%
1326
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
GeForce GTX 765M
72
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
May 2013
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
797 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
863 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.81 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.23 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1326 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.23 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
75W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
N14E-GE-B-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
