GeForce MX250 vs GeForce GTX 780M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1038MHz vs 797MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 122W)
GeForce GTX 780M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
797
GeForce GTX 780M
+207%
2448
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
GeForce GTX 780M
+150%
180
OctaneBench
GeForce MX250
22
GeForce GTX 780M
+31%
29
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
May 2013
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
797 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.0 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.448 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
102.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
122W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-GTX-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
