GeForce MX250 vs NVS 5400M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 2GB VRAM NVS 5400M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
+215%
797
NVS 5400M
253
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce MX
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
96
24
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
4
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.640 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.56 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
253.4 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
21.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
GF108
-
GPU Variant
N13P-NS1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
