GeForce MX250 vs Radeon E9260 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 50W)
Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1200MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
797
Radeon E9260 MXM
+169%
2150
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2016
GeForce MX
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
14
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
Baffin
-
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
3 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4