GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs Radeon AI PRO R9700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and 32GB VRAM Radeon AI PRO R9700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 300W)
Radeon AI PRO R9700 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (2920MHz vs 2535MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (644.6GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
22060
Radeon AI PRO R9700
+116%
47840
Graphics Card
May 2023
Release Date
Jul 2025
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2310 MHz
Base Clock
1660 MHz
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
2920 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
644.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
34
SM Count
-
4352
Shading Units
4096
136
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
136
Tensor Cores
128
34
RT Cores
64
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
121.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
373.8 GPixel/s
344.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
747.5 GTexel/s
22.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
95.68 TFLOPS
22.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.84 TFLOPS
344.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1495 GFLOPS
Board Design
165W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
Navi 48
AD106-351-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XTW
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
4 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
53.9 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
357 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
