GeForce RTX 4080 vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
9512 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080
+8993%
48740
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
536
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
76
SM Count
27
9728
Shading Units
216
304
TMUs
72
112
ROPs
28
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
320W
TDP
171W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
GT200B
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
