GeForce RTX 4090D vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090D and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4090D 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1008GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
10496 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 24GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 425W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090D
+590%
73540
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10650
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 40
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2280 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1008GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
114
SM Count
-
14592
Shading Units
4096
456
TMUs
256
176
ROPs
256
456
Tensor Cores
-
114
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
443.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
1149 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
73.54 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
73.54 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
1149 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
425W
TDP
150W
800 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
AD102-250-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
609 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
