GMA X3100 vs Radeon 680M
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GMA X3100 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 680M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GMA X3100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 50W)
Radeon 680M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
GMA Graphics-M
Generation
Navi II IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
FSB
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
-
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
1
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
500.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
70.40 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.758 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
3.379 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
13W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Crestline
GPU Name
Rembrandt
Crestline-GM
GPU Variant
-
Generation 4.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
13.1 billion
Unknown
Die Size
208 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
