GMA X3100 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GMA X3100 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GMA X3100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 15W)
Iris Pro Graphics 580 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
576 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Sep 2015
GMA Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
FSB
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Shading Units
576
8
TMUs
72
1
ROPs
9
Theoretical Performance
500.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.550 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
273.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
13W
TDP
15W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Crestline
GPU Name
Skylake GT4e
Crestline-GM
GPU Variant
-
Generation 4.0
Architecture
Generation 9.0
Intel
Foundry
Intel
90 nm
Process Size
14 nm+
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
9.0c
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
6.4
