Intel Celeron 4205U vs Intel Pentium N3710

VS

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Celeron 4205U with 2 cores 1.8GHz and Intel Pentium N3710 with 4 cores 1.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron 4205U 's Advantages

Released 3 years late

Higher specification of memory (DDR4-2133 vs DDR3L-1600)

Larger memory bandwidth (37.5GB/s vs 25.6GB/s)

Higher base frequency (1.8GHz vs 1.6GHz)

Intel Pentium N3710 's Advantages

Lower TDP (6W vs 15W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Celeron 4205U +87%

357

Intel Pentium N3710

190

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Celeron 4205U +86%

509

Intel Pentium N3710

273

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Celeron 4205U +91%

444

Intel Pentium N3710

232

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Celeron 4205U +10%

852

Intel Pentium N3710

771

Passmark CPU Single Core

Intel Celeron 4205U +46%

1033

Intel Pentium N3710

707

Passmark CPU Multi Core

Intel Celeron 4205U

1335

Intel Pentium N3710 +9%

1462

Intel Celeron 4205U

VS

Intel Pentium N3710

General Parameters

Jan 2019

Release Date

Jan 2016

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Whiskey Lake

Core Architecture

Braswell

4205U

Processor Number

N3710

BGA-1528

Socket

BGA-1170

UHD Graphics 610

Integrated Graphics

HD Graphics 405

Package

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

BGA-1528

Socket

BGA-1170

15 W

Power Consumption

6 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

90 °C

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

4

2

Performance Core Threads

4

1.8 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

1.6 GHz

2

Total Core Count

4

2

Total Thread Count

4

64 K per core

L1 Cache

96 K per core

256 K per core

L2 Cache

2 MB per core

2 MB shared

L3 Cache

-

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866

Memory Types

DDR3L-1600

64 GB

Max Memory Size

8 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

37.5 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

25.6 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

200 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

900 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

700 MHz

96

Shader Units

-

12

Texture Units

-

2

Raster Operation Units

-

12

Execution Units

-

5 W

Power Consumption

-

4096x2304 - 30 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.06 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron 4205U

Official Website

Intel Pentium N3710

2.0

PCIe Version

2.0

12

PCIe Lanes

4

SSE4.1, SSE4.2

Extended Instruction Set

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core i5 8279U vs Intel Celeron 4205U

2

Intel Celeron 4205U vs Intel Processor N100

3

AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS vs Intel Celeron 4205U

4

Intel Core i5 11300H vs Intel Celeron 4205U

5

AMD Ryzen 3 3300U vs Intel Celeron 4205U

6

Intel Core i5 5200U vs Intel Celeron 4205U

7

AMD Ryzen 7 5700U vs Intel Celeron 4205U

8

Intel Core i7 10850H vs Intel Pentium N3710

9

Intel Celeron 4205U vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

10

Intel Celeron 4205U vs Intel Celeron 7305

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD