Intel Celeron 7305 vs AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

VS

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Celeron 7305 with 5 cores 1.1GHz and AMD Ryzen 7 5825U with 8 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron 7305 's Advantages

Higher specification of memory (LPDDR5-5200 vs LPDDR4x-4267)

Larger memory bandwidth (76.8GB/s vs 51.2GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 3.0)

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U 's Advantages

Higher base frequency (2.0GHz vs 1.1GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 8MB)

Lower TDP (10W vs 12W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Celeron 7305

546

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U +234%

1824

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Celeron 7305

1248

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U +471%

7131

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Celeron 7305

426

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U +240%

1449

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Celeron 7305

1240

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U +457%

6915

Intel Celeron 7305

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

General Parameters

Jan 2022

Release Date

Jan 2022

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Alder Lake

Core Architecture

Barcelo

7305

Processor Number

-

BGA-1744

Socket

FP6

UHD Graphics (48 EU)

Integrated Graphics

Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)

Package

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

7 nm

BGA-1744

Socket

FP6

12-15 W

Power Consumption

10-25 W

55 W

Max Turbo Power Consumption

-

100°C

Peak Operating Temperature

95 °C

CPU Performance

1

Performance Cores

8

1

Performance Core Threads

16

1.1 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.0 GHz

-

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.5 GHz

4

Efficiency Cores

-

4

Efficiency Core Threads

-

0.9 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

5

Total Core Count

8

5

Total Thread Count

16

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

11x

Multiplier

20x

80 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

1280 K per core

L2 Cache

512 K per core

8 MB shared

L3 Cache

16 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267

Memory Types

DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267

64 GB

Max Memory Size

32 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

76.8 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

51.2 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

1100 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

2000 MHz

-

Shader Units

512

-

Texture Units

32

-

Raster Operation Units

8

-

Power Consumption

15 W

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron 7305

Official Website

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

4.0

PCIe Version

3.0

20

PCIe Lanes

16

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Celeron 7305 vs Intel Processor N100

2

Intel Celeron 7305 vs Intel Celeron 6305

3

Intel Celeron 7305 vs Intel Core i3 5010U

4

Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Celeron 7305

5

Intel Processor U300 vs Intel Celeron 7305

6

Intel Pentium Gold 4417U vs Intel Celeron 7305

7

Intel Core i9 13900H vs Intel Celeron 7305

8

AMD Ryzen 7 7730U vs AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

9

Intel Celeron 7305 vs Intel Core i7 8705G

10

Intel Celeron 7305 vs Intel Core i7 12800HX

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD