Intel Celeron G5900T vs Intel Core i7 10700
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron G5900T with 2 cores 3.2GHz and Intel Core i7 10700 with 8 cores 2.9GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Celeron G5900T 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 2.9GHz)
Lower TDP (58W vs 65W)
Intel Core i7 10700 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (2933 vs 2666)
Larger memory bandwidth (45.8GB/s vs 41.6GB/s)
Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 2MB)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron G5900T
748
Intel Core i7 10700
+47%
1101
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron G5900T
750
Intel Core i7 10700
+228%
2467
General Parameters
May 2020
Release Date
May 2020
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Comet Lake
Core Architecture
Comet Lake
G5900T
Processor Number
i7-10700
LGA-1200
Socket
LGA-1200
UHD Graphics 610
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 630
Package
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
58 W
Power Consumption
65 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
CPU Performance
2
Performance Cores
8
2
Performance Core Threads
16
3.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
2
Total Core Count
8
2
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
32x
Multiplier
29x
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
2 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR4-2933
128 GB
Max Memory Size
128 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
41.6 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
45.8 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
true
350 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
350 MHz
1000 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1200 MHz
96
Shader Units
192
12
Texture Units
24
2
Raster Operation Units
3
12
Execution Units
24
15 W
Power Consumption
15 W
4096x2304 - 30 Hz
Max Resolution
4096x2304 - 60 Hz
0.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.38 TFLOPS
