Home Comparison Intel Celeron G5920 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Intel Celeron G5920 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron G5920 with 2 cores 3.5GHz and Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with 24 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron G5920 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 2.5GHz)
Lower TDP (58W vs 125W)
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2666)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 41.6GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)
Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 2MB)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

May 2020
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Comet Lake
Core Architecture
Arrow Lake-S
G5920
Processor Number
-
LGA-1200
Socket
Intel Socket 1851
UHD Graphics 610
Integrated Graphics
Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU
-
Generation
Ultra 9 (Arrow Lake)

Package

14 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
58 W
Power Consumption
125 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
105 °C
-
Foundry
Intel

CPU Performance

2
Performance Cores
8
2
Performance Core Threads
16
3.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
-
Efficiency Cores
16
-
Efficiency Core Threads
16
-
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1900 MHz
-
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
2
Total Core Count
24
2
Total Thread Count
24
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
35x
Multiplier
25.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
112 KB per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
3 MB per core
2 MB shared
L3 Cache
36 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR5-5600
128 GB
Max Memory Size
256 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
41.6 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
350 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
600 MHz
1050 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1800 MHz
96
Shader Units
512
12
Texture Units
-
2
Raster Operation Units
-
12
Execution Units
4
15 W
Power Consumption
-
4096x2304 - 30 Hz
Max Resolution
-
0.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
1.79 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website
3.0
PCIe Version
5
16
PCIe Lanes
16

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy