Home Comparison Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Celeron J1900

Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Celeron J1900

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron G6900 with 2 cores 3.4GHz and Intel Celeron J1900 with 4 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron G6900 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 1333)
Larger memory bandwidth (76.8GB/s vs 21.3GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 2.0)
Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 2.0GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 22nm)
Intel Celeron J1900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 46W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron G6900 +810%
1666
Intel Celeron J1900
183
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron G6900 +368%
2676
Intel Celeron J1900
571
VS

General Parameters

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2013
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Alder Lake
Core Architecture
Bay Trail
G6900
Processor Number
J1900
LGA-1700
Socket
FCBGA1170
UHD Graphics 710
Integrated Graphics
Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series

Package

10 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
46 W
Power Consumption
10 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
105 °C

CPU Performance

2
Performance Cores
4
2
Performance Core Threads
4
3.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.0 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.42 GHz
2
Total Core Count
4
2
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
-
34x
Multiplier
20x
80 K per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
1280 K per core
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR3L-1333
128 GB
Max Memory Size
8 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
76.8 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
21.3 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
688 MHz
1300 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
854 MHz
128
Shader Units
-
8
Texture Units
-
8
Raster Operation Units
-
16
Execution Units
-
15 W
Power Consumption
-
0.36 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.04 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

5.0
PCIe Version
2.0
20
PCIe Lanes
4

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy