Home Comparison Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

Intel Celeron G6900
VS
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Intel Celeron G6900
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron G6900 with 2 cores 3.4GHz and Intel Core Ultra 7 265K with 20 cores 3.9GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron G6900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (46W vs 125W)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 4800)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 76.8GB/s)
Higher base frequency (3.9GHz vs 3.4GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (30MB vs 4MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Celeron G6900
1284
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K +79%
2304
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Celeron G6900
2476
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K +1367%
36335
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron G6900
1666
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K +89%
3156
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron G6900
2676
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K +698%
21364
Blender
Intel Celeron G6900
22
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K +2109%
486
Intel Celeron G6900
VS
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

General Parameters

Jan 2022
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Alder Lake
Core Architecture
Arrow Lake
G6900
Processor Number
265K
LGA-1700
Socket
FCLGA-1851
UHD Graphics 710
Integrated Graphics
Arc Xe2 (Arrow Lake-S)
-
Generation
Ultra 7(Arrow Lake)

Package

10 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
46 W
Power Consumption
125 W
-
Max Turbo Power Consumption
250 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
105 °C
-
Foundry
TSMC

CPU Performance

2
Performance Cores
8
2
Performance Core Threads
8
3.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
-
Efficiency Cores
12
-
Efficiency Core Threads
12
-
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
-
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
2
Total Core Count
20
2
Total Thread Count
20
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
34x
Multiplier
39
80 K per core
L1 Cache
112 K per core
1280 K per core
L2 Cache
3 MB per core
4 MB shared
L3 Cache
30 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
-
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-6400
128 GB
Max Memory Size
192 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
76.8 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
1300 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
2000 MHz
128
Shader Units
512
8
Texture Units
16
8
Raster Operation Units
8
16
Execution Units
64
15 W
Power Consumption
-
0.36 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
2.05 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron G6900
Official Website
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
5.0
PCIe Version
5.0
20
PCIe Lanes
24

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Pentium Gold G5400
2
Intel Celeron G6900 vs AMD Threadripper PRO 7945WX
3
Intel Celeron G6900 vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900
4
Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core i5 13600KF
5
Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Celeron G5900
6
Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Celeron J4025
7
Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core i7 10700F
8
Intel Celeron G6900 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3945WX
9
Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core i7 10700
10
Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core i7 14700T

Related News

1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy