Intel Celeron J4005 vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

VS

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J4005 with 2 cores 2.0GHz and AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT with 12 cores 3.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron J4005 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Lower TDP (10W vs 105W)

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 7 months late

Higher specification of memory (DDR4-3200 vs DDR4-2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (47.68GB/s vs 35.76GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 2.0)

Higher base frequency (3.8GHz vs 2.0GHz)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Celeron J4005

361

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT +388%

1763

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Celeron J4005

623

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT +1669%

11025

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Celeron J4005

440

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT +197%

1311

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Celeron J4005

817

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT +1402%

12279

Passmark CPU Single Core

Intel Celeron J4005

1087

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT +154%

2769

Passmark CPU Multi Core

Intel Celeron J4005

1578

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT +1982%

32856

Intel Celeron J4005

VS

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

General Parameters

Dec 2017

Release Date

Jul 2020

Intel

Manufacturer

Amd

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Gemini Lake

Core Architecture

Zen 2 (Matisse)

J4005

Processor Number

-

BGA-1090

Socket

AM4

UHD Graphics 600

Integrated Graphics

No

Package

-

Transistor Count

3.8 billions

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

7 nm

BGA-1090

Socket

AM4

10 W

Power Consumption

105 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

95°C

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

12

2

Performance Core Threads

24

2.0 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.8 GHz

-

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.7 GHz

2

Total Core Count

12

2

Total Thread Count

24

-

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

-

Multiplier

38x

48 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

4 MB per core

L2 Cache

512 K per core

-

L3 Cache

64 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

Yes

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400

Memory Types

DDR4-3200

8 GB

Max Memory Size

128 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

35.76 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

47.68 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

-

200 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

700 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

96

Shader Units

-

12

Texture Units

-

2

Raster Operation Units

-

12

Execution Units

-

5 W

Power Consumption

-

3840x2160 - 30 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.14 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron J4005

Official Website

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

2.0

PCIe Version

4.0

6

PCIe Lanes

24

SSE4.2

Extended Instruction Set

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core i5 7400 vs Intel Celeron J4005

2

AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE vs Intel Celeron J4005

3

Intel Core i9 10980XE vs Intel Celeron J4005

4

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Celeron J4005

5

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Celeron J4005

6

Intel Core i5 6400 vs Intel Celeron J4005

7

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Celeron N4000

8

Intel Core i5 11600 vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

9

Intel Celeron J4005 vs AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

10

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i5 10600KF

Related News

1

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

2

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip

3

AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly

4

NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products

5

NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs

6

Only 3 Weeks Left! AMD Zen5 Launching Soon

7

Ilya Departs OpenAI to Launch New Company Aiming at Superintelligence!

8

Comprehensive Overview of AMD Ryzen 9000 Zen5 Desktop CPUs

9

Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher

10

It's 2024: This Company Released a Laptop Supporting DOS and Windows 95