Home Comparison Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i5 8400

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i5 8400

Intel Celeron J4005
VS
Intel Core i5 8400
Intel Celeron J4005
Intel Core i5 8400
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J4005 with 2 cores 2.0GHz and Intel Core i5 8400 with 6 cores 2.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron J4005 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 65W)
Intel Core i5 8400 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (2666 vs 2400)
Larger memory bandwidth (41.6GB/s vs 35.76GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (3.0 vs 2.0)
Higher base frequency (2.8GHz vs 2.0GHz)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron J4005
361
Intel Core i5 8400 +259%
1298
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron J4005
623
Intel Core i5 8400 +650%
4677
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Celeron J4005
440
Intel Core i5 8400 +134%
1032
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Celeron J4005
817
Intel Core i5 8400 +464%
4611
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Celeron J4005
1087
Intel Core i5 8400 +119%
2387
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Celeron J4005
1578
Intel Core i5 8400 +483%
9214
Intel Celeron J4005
VS
Intel Core i5 8400

General Parameters

Dec 2017
Release Date
Oct 2017
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Gemini Lake
Core Architecture
Coffee Lake
J4005
Processor Number
i5-8400
BGA-1090
Socket
LGA-1151
UHD Graphics 600
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 630

Package

14 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
10 W
Power Consumption
65 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C

CPU Performance

2
Performance Cores
6
2
Performance Core Threads
6
2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
2
Total Core Count
6
2
Total Thread Count
6
-
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
-
Multiplier
28x
48 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
4 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
-
L3 Cache
9 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
8 GB
Max Memory Size
128 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
35.76 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
41.6 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
200 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
350 MHz
700 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1050 MHz
96
Shader Units
192
12
Texture Units
24
2
Raster Operation Units
3
12
Execution Units
24
5 W
Power Consumption
15 W
3840x2160 - 30 Hz
Max Resolution
4096x2304 - 60 Hz
0.14 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.38 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron J4005
Official Website
Intel Core i5 8400
2.0
PCIe Version
3.0
6
PCIe Lanes
16
SSE4.2
Extended Instruction Set
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i7 9800X
2
Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Pentium G4600
3
Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core 3 100HL
4
Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i7 12700TE
5
Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i5 12600T
6
Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125UL
7
Intel Celeron J4005 vs AMD Ryzen 5 7600
8
Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i5 9500T
9
Intel Celeron J4005 vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
10
Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Processor 300

Related News

1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy