Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i9 13900F

VS

Intel Celeron J4005

Intel Core i9 13900F

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J4005 with 2 cores 2.0GHz and Intel Core i9 13900F with 24 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron J4005 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Lower TDP (10W vs 65W)

Intel Core i9 13900F 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 1 months late

Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (89.6GB/s vs 35.76GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 2.0)

More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Celeron J4005

361

Intel Core i9 13900F +661%

2748

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Celeron J4005

623

Intel Core i9 13900F +2907%

18735

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Celeron J4005

440

Intel Core i9 13900F +382%

2121

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Celeron J4005

817

Intel Core i9 13900F +2575%

21860

Passmark CPU Single Core

Intel Celeron J4005

1087

Intel Core i9 13900F +308%

4445

Passmark CPU Multi Core

Intel Celeron J4005

1578

Intel Core i9 13900F +3185%

51844

Intel Celeron J4005

VS

Intel Core i9 13900F

General Parameters

Dec 2017

Release Date

Jan 2023

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Gemini Lake

Core Architecture

Raptor Lake

J4005

Processor Number

i9-13900F

BGA-1090

Socket

LGA-1700

UHD Graphics 600

Integrated Graphics

No

Package

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

10 nm

10 W

Power Consumption

65 W

-

Max Turbo Power Consumption

219 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100°C

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

8

2

Performance Core Threads

16

2.0 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.0 GHz

-

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

5.2 GHz

-

Efficiency Cores

16

-

Efficiency Core Threads

16

-

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

1.5 GHz

-

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

4.2 GHz

2

Total Core Count

24

2

Total Thread Count

32

-

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

-

Multiplier

20x

48 K per core

L1 Cache

80 K per core

4 MB per core

L2 Cache

2 MB per core

-

L3 Cache

36 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400

Memory Types

DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200

8 GB

Max Memory Size

192 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

35.76 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

89.6 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

-

200 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

700 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

96

Shader Units

-

12

Texture Units

-

2

Raster Operation Units

-

12

Execution Units

-

5 W

Power Consumption

-

3840x2160 - 30 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.14 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron J4005

Official Website

Intel Core i9 13900F

2.0

PCIe Version

5.0

6

PCIe Lanes

20

SSE4.2

Extended Instruction Set

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i5 14600K

2

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i9 9900KF

3

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i3 13100F

4

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i5 9400

5

Intel Celeron J4005 vs AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

6

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i3 10105F

7

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i5 13400TE

8

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i5 14401E

9

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i9 12900K

10

Intel Celeron J4005 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU