Home Comparison Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J4005 with 2 cores 2.0GHz and Intel Core Ultra 9 285T with 24 cores 1.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron J4005 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.0GHz vs 1.4GHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2400)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 35.76GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2.0)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Dec 2017
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Gemini Lake
Core Architecture
Arrow Lake-S
J4005
Processor Number
-
BGA-1090
Socket
Intel Socket 1851
UHD Graphics 600
Integrated Graphics
Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU
-
Generation
Ultra 9 (Arrow Lake)

Package

14 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
10 W
Power Consumption
35 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
105 °C
-
Foundry
Intel

CPU Performance

2
Performance Cores
8
2
Performance Core Threads
16
2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
-
Efficiency Cores
16
-
Efficiency Core Threads
16
-
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1200 MHz
-
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
2
Total Core Count
24
2
Total Thread Count
24
-
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
-
Multiplier
14.0
48 K per core
L1 Cache
112 KB per core
4 MB per core
L2 Cache
3 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
36 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400
Memory Types
DDR5-5600
8 GB
Max Memory Size
256 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
35.76 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
200 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
600 MHz
700 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1800 MHz
96
Shader Units
512
12
Texture Units
-
2
Raster Operation Units
-
12
Execution Units
4
5 W
Power Consumption
-
3840x2160 - 30 Hz
Max Resolution
-
0.14 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
1.79 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website
2.0
PCIe Version
5
6
PCIe Lanes
16
SSE4.2
Extended Instruction Set
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy