Intel Celeron J4025 vs Loongson LS3A6000

VS

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J4025 with 2 cores 2.0GHz and Loongson LS3A6000 with 4 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron J4025 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Lower TDP (10W vs 50W)

Loongson LS3A6000 's Advantages

Released 4 years late

Higher specification of memory (DDR4-3200 vs DDR4-2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (42GB/s vs 38.4GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 2.0)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Celeron J4025 +74%

395

Loongson LS3A6000

226

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Celeron J4025

675

Loongson LS3A6000 +31%

888

Intel Celeron J4025

VS

Loongson LS3A6000

General Parameters

Nov 2019

Release Date

Nov 2023

Intel

Manufacturer

Loongson

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

LoongArch

Gemini Lake Refresh

Core Architecture

LA664

J4025

Processor Number

LS3A6000

BGA-1090

Socket

FCBGA-1190

UHD Graphics 600

Integrated Graphics

No

-

Generation

3A6000

Package

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

12 nm

BGA-1090

Socket

FCBGA-1190

10 W

Power Consumption

50 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

70°C

-

Foundry

Loongson

-

Die Size

257 mm²

-

Package

FCBGA-1190

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

4

2

Performance Core Threads

8

2.0 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.0 GHz

2.9 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

2.5 GHz

2

Total Core Count

4

2

Total Thread Count

8

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

20x

Multiplier

20

32 K per core

L1 Cache

128 K per core

4 MB shared

L2 Cache

1 MB

-

L3 Cache

16 MB

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

-

SMP

1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400

Memory Types

DDR4-3200

8 GB

Max Memory Size

32 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

38.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

42 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

-

200 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

700 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

96

Shader Units

-

12

Texture Units

-

2

Raster Operation Units

-

12

Execution Units

-

5 W

Power Consumption

-

3840x2160 - 30 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.14 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron J4025

Official Website

Loongson LS3A6000

2.0

PCIe Version

5.0

6

PCIe Lanes

20

SSE4.2

Extended Instruction Set

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Celeron J4025

2

AMD Ryzen 5 5600 vs Intel Celeron J4025

3

Intel Core i3 9100 vs Intel Celeron J4025

4

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F vs Intel Celeron J4025

5

Intel Core i9 11900F vs Intel Celeron J4025

6

Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Celeron J4025

7

Intel Core i5 12600KF vs Intel Celeron J4025

8

Intel Core i5 9500 vs Loongson LS3A6000

9

Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

10

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i7 12700KF

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD