Intel Celeron J4125 vs Intel Celeron J1900
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J4125 with 4 cores 2.0GHz and Intel Celeron J1900 with 4 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Celeron J4125 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (2400 vs 1333)
Larger memory bandwidth (38.4GB/s vs 21.3GB/s)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 22nm)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron J4125
+89%
346
Intel Celeron J1900
183
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron J4125
+37%
784
Intel Celeron J1900
571
General Parameters
Nov 2019
Release Date
Nov 2013
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Gemini Lake Refresh
Core Architecture
Bay Trail
J4125
Processor Number
J1900
BGA-1090
Socket
FCBGA1170
UHD Graphics 600
Integrated Graphics
Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Package
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
10 W
Power Consumption
10 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
105 °C
CPU Performance
4
Performance Cores
4
4
Performance Core Threads
4
2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.0 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.42 GHz
4
Total Core Count
4
4
Total Thread Count
4
20x
Multiplier
20x
32 K per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
4 MB shared
L2 Cache
2 MB
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400
Memory Types
DDR3L-1333
8 GB
Max Memory Size
8 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
38.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
21.3 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
true
200 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
688 MHz
750 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
854 MHz
96
Shader Units
-
12
Texture Units
-
2
Raster Operation Units
-
12
Execution Units
-
5 W
Power Consumption
-
3840x2160 - 30 Hz
Max Resolution
-
0.14 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.04 TFLOPS
Miscellaneous
2.0
PCIe Version
2.0
6
PCIe Lanes
4
SSE4.2
Extended Instruction Set
-
