Intel Celeron N3060 vs AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

VS

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Celeron N3060 with 2 cores 1.6GHz and AMD Ryzen 7 5825U with 8 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron N3060 's Advantages

Lower TDP (6W vs 10W)

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U 's Advantages

Released 6 years late

Higher specification of memory (LPDDR4x-4267 vs DDR3L-1600)

Larger memory bandwidth (51.2GB/s vs 25.6GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (3.0 vs 2.0)

Higher base frequency (2.0GHz vs 1.6GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 2MB)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Celeron N3060

115

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U +1486%

1824

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Celeron N3060

209

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U +3311%

7131

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Celeron N3060

211

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U +586%

1449

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Celeron N3060

386

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U +1691%

6915

Passmark CPU Single Core

Intel Celeron N3060

622

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U +388%

3040

Passmark CPU Multi Core

Intel Celeron N3060

652

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U +2719%

18382

Intel Celeron N3060

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

General Parameters

Jan 2016

Release Date

Jan 2022

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Braswell

Core Architecture

Barcelo

N3060

Processor Number

-

BGA-1170

Socket

FP6

HD Graphics 400

Integrated Graphics

Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)

Package

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

7 nm

BGA-1170

Socket

FP6

6 W

Power Consumption

10-25 W

90 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

95 °C

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

8

2

Performance Core Threads

16

1.6 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.0 GHz

-

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.5 GHz

2

Total Core Count

8

2

Total Thread Count

16

-

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

-

Multiplier

20x

48 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

1 MB per core

L2 Cache

512 K per core

2 MB shared

L3 Cache

16 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR3L-1600

Memory Types

DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267

8 GB

Max Memory Size

32 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

25.6 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

51.2 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

600 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

2000 MHz

-

Shader Units

512

-

Texture Units

32

-

Raster Operation Units

8

-

Power Consumption

15 W

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron N3060

Official Website

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

2.0

PCIe Version

3.0

4

PCIe Lanes

16

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Core i7 13850HX

2

Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Pentium Silver N5000

3

Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Processor N100

4

Intel Celeron N3060 vs AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

5

Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 115U

6

Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Core i5 8250U

7

Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 134U

8

Apple M3 vs Intel Celeron N3060

9

Intel Celeron N3060 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

10

Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Processor N100

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD