Intel Celeron N3060 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite
We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Celeron N3060 with 2 cores 1.6GHz and Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite with 12 cores 3.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Celeron N3060 's Advantages
Lower TDP (6W vs 65W)
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (8448 vs 1600)
Larger memory bandwidth (135GB/s vs 25.6GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 2.0)
Higher base frequency (3.8GHz vs 1.6GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (42MB vs 2MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 14nm)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron N3060
115
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite
+2491%
2980
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron N3060
209
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite
+7185%
15226
General Parameters
Jan 2016
Release Date
Oct 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
Qualcomm
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
Arm-64
Braswell
Core Architecture
Oryon
N3060
Processor Number
Snapdragon X Elite
BGA-1170
Socket
HD Graphics 400
Integrated Graphics
Adreno
-
Generation
Oryon
Package
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
6 W
Power Consumption
23-65 W
-
Max Turbo Power Consumption
80 W
90 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Foundry
Samsung TSMC
-
Die Size
mm²
CPU Performance
2
Performance Cores
12
2
Performance Core Threads
12
1.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
2
Total Core Count
12
2
Total Thread Count
12
-
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
-
Multiplier
48 K per core
L1 Cache
-
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
-
2 MB shared
L3 Cache
42 MB
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR3L-1600
Memory Types
LPDDR5x-8448
8 GB
Max Memory Size
64 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
25.6 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
135 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Base Frequency
600 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
Shader Units
-
Texture Units
-
Raster Operation Units
-
Execution Units
-
Power Consumption
-
Graphics Performance
4.6 TFLOPS
