Home Comparison Intel Celeron N3350E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E 84 100

Intel Celeron N3350E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E 84 100

Intel Celeron N3350E
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E 84 100
Intel Celeron N3350E
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100)
We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Celeron N3350E with 2 cores 1.1GHz and Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E 84 100 with 12 cores 3.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron N3350E 's Advantages
Lower TDP (6W vs 23W)
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E 84 100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (8448 vs 2400)
Larger memory bandwidth (135GB/s vs 29.9GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 2.0)
Higher base frequency (3.8GHz vs 1.1GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Celeron N3350E
325
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E 84 100 +450%
1790
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Celeron N3350E
250
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E 84 100 +5804%
14761
Intel Celeron N3350E
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E 84 100

General Parameters

Jul 2019
Release Date
Oct 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
Qualcomm
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
ARMv9
Apollo Lake
Core Architecture
Snapdragon X
N3350E
Processor Number
X1E-84-100
BGA-1296
Socket
Custom
HD Graphics 500
Integrated Graphics
Qualcomm Adreno X1

Package

14 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
6 W
Power Consumption
23 W
-
Max Turbo Power Consumption
80 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-

CPU Performance

2
Performance Cores
12
2
Performance Core Threads
12
1.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
2
Total Core Count
12
2
Total Thread Count
12
-
Multiplier
38x
32 K per core
L1 Cache
-
2 MB shared
L2 Cache
-
-
L3 Cache
42 MB
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No

Memory Parameters

DDR3L-1866, LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400
Memory Types
LPDDR5x-8448
8 GB
Max Memory Size
64 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
8
29.9 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
135 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
200 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
500 MHz
650 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1500 MHz
96
Shader Units
1536
12
Texture Units
48
2
Raster Operation Units
6
12
Execution Units
6
6 W
Power Consumption
-
3840x2160 - 30 Hz
Max Resolution
-
0.12 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
4.6 TFLOPS

AI Accelerator

-
NPU
Qualcomm Hexagon NPU
-
Theoretical performance
45 TOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron N3350E
Official Website
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E 84 100
2.0
PCIe Version
4.0
6
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Celeron N3350E vs AMD Ryzen 9 8940H
2
Intel Celeron N3350E vs Intel Core i7 1365U
3
Intel Celeron N3350E vs Intel Core 7 150U
4
Intel Celeron N3350E vs Intel Core i5 8210Y
5
Intel Celeron N3350E vs Intel Core i5 1145G7
6
Intel Celeron N3350E vs Intel Core i3 1005G1
7
Intel Celeron N3350E vs Intel Core i5 1345U
8
Intel Celeron N3350E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E 00 1DE
9
Intel Celeron N3350E vs Intel Core i3 1125G4
10
Intel Celeron N3350E vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600H

Related News

1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy