Intel Core 7 240H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 165U

VS

Intel Core 7 240H

Intel Core Ultra 7 165U

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core 7 240H with 10 cores 2.5GHz and Intel Core Ultra 7 165U with 12 cores 1.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core 7 240H 's Advantages

Released 1 years late

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4.0)

Higher base frequency (2.5GHz vs 1.7GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 12MB)

Lower TDP (45W vs 57W)

Intel Core Ultra 7 165U 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Higher specification of memory (7467 vs 5200)

Larger memory bandwidth (120GB/s vs 83.2GB/s)

More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 10nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core 7 240H

2341

Intel Core Ultra 7 165U +1%

2384

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core 7 240H +24%

12108

Intel Core Ultra 7 165U

9763

Intel Core 7 240H

VS

Intel Core Ultra 7 165U

General Parameters

Dec 2024

Release Date

Dec 2023

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

-

Instruction Set

x86-64

Raptor Lake-H

Core Architecture

Meteor Lake

-

Processor Number

165U

Intel BGA 1744

Socket

FCBGA-2049

Iris Xe Graphics 64EU

Integrated Graphics

Arc Graphics (4-Cores)

Core 7(Raptor Lake-H Refresh)

Generation

Ultra 7 (Meteor Lake)

Package

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

7 nm

45 W

Power Consumption

12-57 W

100°C

Peak Operating Temperature

110°C

Intel

Foundry

Intel

CPU Performance

6

Performance Cores

2

12

Performance Core Threads

4

2.5 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

1.7 GHz

5.2 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.9 GHz

4

Efficiency Cores

10

4

Efficiency Core Threads

10

1800 MHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

1.2 GHz

4 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

3.8 GHz

10

Total Core Count

12

16

Total Thread Count

14

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

25.0

Multiplier

17x

80 KB per core

L1 Cache

112 K per core

2 MB per core

L2 Cache

2 MB per core

24 MB shared

L3 Cache

12 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200

Memory Types

LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600

-

Max Memory Size

96 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

83.2 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

120 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

2000 MHz

-

Shader Units

64

-

Texture Units

4

-

Raster Operation Units

2

-

Execution Units

4

-

Max Resolution

7680x4320 - 60 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

2.24 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Core 7 240H

Official Website

Intel Core Ultra 7 165U

5

PCIe Version

4.0

8

PCIe Lanes

20

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core 7 240H vs AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

2

Intel Core 7 240H vs AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

3

Intel Core 7 240H vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

4

Intel Core 7 240H vs Intel Celeron 4205U

5

Intel Core 7 240H vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS

6

Intel Core 7 240H vs AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

7

Intel Core 7 240H vs Intel Pentium N3700

8

Intel Core 7 240H vs Intel Core i5 11300H

9

Intel Core 7 240H vs Intel Core i5 13505H

10

Intel Core 7 240H vs Intel Core i7 10710U

Related News

1

NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory

2

Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB

3

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

4

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

5

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

6

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

7

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

8

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

9

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

10

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim