Intel Core i5 14600T vs Intel Celeron J3455E

VS

Intel Core i5 14600T Intel Celeron J3455E

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i5 14600T with 14 cores 1.8GHz and Intel Celeron J3455E with 4 cores 1.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i5 14600T 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 6 months late

Larger memory bandwidth (89.6GB/s vs 29.9GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2.0)

Higher base frequency (1.8GHz vs 1.5GHz)

More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)

Intel Celeron J3455E 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Higher specification of memory (LPDDR4-2400 vs DDR5-5600)

Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core i5 14600T +856%

2830

Intel Celeron J3455E

296

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core i5 14600T +1708%

15337

Intel Celeron J3455E

848

Intel Core i5 14600T

VS

Intel Celeron J3455E

General Parameters

Jan 2024

Release Date

Jul 2019

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

-

Instruction Set

x86-64

Raptor Lake-R

Core Architecture

Apollo Lake

-

Processor Number

J3455E

Intel Socket 1700

Socket

BGA-1296

UHD Graphics 770

Integrated Graphics

HD Graphics 500

Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Generation

-

Package

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

Intel Socket 1700

Socket

BGA-1296

35 W

Power Consumption

10 W

-

Peak Operating Temperature

105 °C

Intel

Foundry

-

257 mm²

Die Size

-

FC-LGA16A

Package

-

CPU Performance

6

Performance Cores

4

12

Performance Core Threads

4

1.8 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

1.5 GHz

5.1 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

2.3 GHz

8

Efficiency Cores

-

8

Efficiency Core Threads

-

2000 MHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

3.6 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

14

Total Core Count

4

20

Total Thread Count

4

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

18.0

Multiplier

15x

80 KB per core

L1 Cache

32 K per core

2 MB per core

L2 Cache

2 MB shared

24 MB shared

L3 Cache

-

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200, DDR5-5600

Memory Types

DDR3L-1866, LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400

-

Max Memory Size

8 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

89.6 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

29.9 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

750 MHz

Miscellaneous

Intel Core i5 14600T

Official Website

Intel Celeron J3455E

5

PCIe Version

2.0

16

PCIe Lanes

6

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core i5 14600T vs Intel Core i9 12900

2

Intel Core i5 14600T vs Intel Core i3 9350KF

3

Intel Core i5 14600T vs Intel Core i7 14700T

4

Intel Core i5 14600T vs AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE

5

Intel Core i5 14600T vs Intel Core i9 13900

6

Intel Core i5 14600T vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3945WX

7

Intel Core i5 14600T vs Intel Core i9 14900T

8

Intel Core i7 7700K vs Intel Core i5 14600T

9

Intel Core i5 14600T vs Intel Pentium Gold G5600

10

Intel Core i5 14600T vs Intel Core i7 14700F

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD