Home Comparison Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Celeron G4900

Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Celeron G4900

Intel Core i5 8400
VS
Intel Celeron G4900
Intel Core i5 8400
Intel Celeron G4900
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i5 8400 with 6 cores 2.8GHz and Intel Celeron G4900 with 2 cores 3.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i5 8400 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (2666 vs 2400)
Larger memory bandwidth (41.6GB/s vs 37.5GB/s)
Larger L3 cache size (9MB vs 2MB)
Intel Celeron G4900 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Higher base frequency (3.1GHz vs 2.8GHz)
Lower TDP (54W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core i5 8400 +121%
1298
Intel Celeron G4900
585
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core i5 8400 +337%
4677
Intel Celeron G4900
1070
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Core i5 8400 +35%
1032
Intel Celeron G4900
763
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Core i5 8400 +224%
4611
Intel Celeron G4900
1421
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Core i5 8400 +26%
2387
Intel Celeron G4900
1882
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Core i5 8400 +279%
9214
Intel Celeron G4900
2427
Intel Core i5 8400
VS
Intel Celeron G4900

General Parameters

Oct 2017
Release Date
Apr 2018
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Coffee Lake
Core Architecture
Coffee Lake
i5-8400
Processor Number
G4900
LGA-1151
Socket
LGA-1151
UHD Graphics 630
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 610

Package

14 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
54 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C

CPU Performance

6
Performance Cores
2
6
Performance Core Threads
2
2.8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
-
6
Total Core Count
2
6
Total Thread Count
2
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
28x
Multiplier
31x
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
9 MB shared
L3 Cache
2 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR4-2400
128 GB
Max Memory Size
64 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
41.6 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
37.5 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
350 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
350 MHz
1050 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1050 MHz
192
Shader Units
96
24
Texture Units
12
3
Raster Operation Units
2
24
Execution Units
12
15 W
Power Consumption
15 W
4096x2304 - 60 Hz
Max Resolution
4096x2304 - 30 Hz
0.38 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.2 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Core i5 8400
Official Website
Intel Celeron G4900
3.0
PCIe Version
3.0
16
PCIe Lanes
16
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2
Extended Instruction Set
SSE4.1, SSE4.2

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Core i5 8400 vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
2
Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i7 14701E
3
Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i7 6700K
4
Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Celeron G5905
5
Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i7 7740X
6
Intel Core i5 8400 vs AMD Ryzen 3 2300X
7
Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 240
8
Intel Core i5 8400 vs AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
9
Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i9 12900TE
10
Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Celeron G3930

Related News

1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy