Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core 7 160HL

VS

Intel Core i5 8400

Intel Core 7 160HL

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i5 8400 with 6 cores 2.8GHz and Intel Core 7 160HL with 14 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i5 8400 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Higher base frequency (2.8GHz vs 2.5GHz)

Intel Core 7 160HL 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 6 months late

Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 2666)

Larger memory bandwidth (83.2GB/s vs 41.6GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 9MB)

More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)

Lower TDP (45W vs 65W)

Score

Intel Core i5 8400

VS

Intel Core 7 160HL

General Parameters

Oct 2017

Release Date

Apr 2024

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

-

Coffee Lake

Core Architecture

Raptor Lake-PS

i5-8400

Processor Number

-

LGA-1151

Socket

Intel Socket 1700

UHD Graphics 630

Integrated Graphics

Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

-

Generation

Core 7 (Raptor Lake-PS)

Package

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

10 nm

65 W

Power Consumption

45 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

-

Foundry

Intel

CPU Performance

6

Performance Cores

6

Performance Core Threads

12

2.8 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.5 GHz

4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

5.2 GHz

-

Efficiency Cores

8

-

Efficiency Core Threads

8

-

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

1800 MHz

-

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

4 GHz

6

Total Core Count

14

6

Total Thread Count

20

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

28x

Multiplier

25.0

64 K per core

L1 Cache

80 KB per core

256 K per core

L2 Cache

2 MB per core

9 MB shared

L3 Cache

24 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

-

SMP

1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666

Memory Types

DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200

128 GB

Max Memory Size

96 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

41.6 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

83.2 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

-

350 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

1050 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

192

Shader Units

-

24

Texture Units

-

3

Raster Operation Units

-

24

Execution Units

-

15 W

Power Consumption

-

4096x2304 - 60 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.38 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Core i5 8400

Official Website

Intel Core 7 160HL

3.0

PCIe Version

4

16

PCIe Lanes

8

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Extended Instruction Set

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i5 14501TE

2

Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i3 13100TE

3

Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i9 13900F

4

Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i9 9900T

5

Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285

6

Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i5 6400

7

Intel Core i5 8400 vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700

8

Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i5 13500T

9

Intel Core i5 8400 vs AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750GE

10

Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i7 12700E

Related News

1

AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!

2

Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies

3

NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory

4

Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB

5

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

6

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

7

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

8

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

9

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

10

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market