Home Comparison Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i9 14900KS

Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i9 14900KS

Intel Core i5 8400
VS
Intel Core i9 14900KS
Intel Core i5 8400
Intel Core i9 14900KS
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i5 8400 with 6 cores 2.8GHz and Intel Core i9 14900KS with 24 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i5 8400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
Intel Core i9 14900KS 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2666)
Larger memory bandwidth (89.6GB/s vs 41.6GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3.0)
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 2.8GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 9MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core i5 8400
1026
Intel Core i9 14900KS +133%
2398
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core i5 8400
5798
Intel Core i9 14900KS +606%
40976
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core i5 8400
1298
Intel Core i9 14900KS +165%
3444
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core i5 8400
4677
Intel Core i9 14900KS +413%
24020
Blender
Intel Core i5 8400
83
Intel Core i9 14900KS +626%
603
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Core i5 8400
2387
Intel Core i9 14900KS +109%
4990
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Core i5 8400
9214
Intel Core i9 14900KS +608%
65287
Intel Core i5 8400
VS
Intel Core i9 14900KS

General Parameters

Oct 2017
Release Date
Mar 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Coffee Lake
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake Refresh
i5-8400
Processor Number
i9-14900KS
LGA-1151
Socket
LGA-1700
UHD Graphics 630
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770

Package

14 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
150 W
-
Max Turbo Power Consumption
253 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C

CPU Performance

6
Performance Cores
8
6
Performance Core Threads
16
2.8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
6.2 GHz
-
Efficiency Cores
16
-
Efficiency Core Threads
16
-
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
-
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
6
Total Core Count
24
6
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
28x
Multiplier
32x
64 K per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
9 MB shared
L3 Cache
36 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
128 GB
Max Memory Size
192 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
41.6 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
350 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
1050 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1650 MHz
192
Shader Units
256
24
Texture Units
16
3
Raster Operation Units
8
24
Execution Units
32
15 W
Power Consumption
15 W
4096x2304 - 60 Hz
Max Resolution
-
0.38 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.78 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Core i5 8400
Official Website
Intel Core i9 14900KS
3.0
PCIe Version
5.0
16
PCIe Lanes
20
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2
Extended Instruction Set
-

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i5 10400
2
Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 165HL
3
Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 165UL
4
Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Pentium Gold G5600
5
Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i9 10900
6
Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i9 12900E
7
Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i9 11900F
8
Intel Core i5 8400 vs Loongson LS3A6000
9
Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Celeron J4005
10
Intel Core i5 8400 vs AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

Related News

1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy