Home Comparison Intel Core i9 10900F vs Intel Core 7 160HL

Intel Core i9 10900F vs Intel Core 7 160HL

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i9 10900F with 10 cores 2.8GHz and Intel Core 7 160HL with 14 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i9 10900F 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.8GHz vs 2.5GHz)
Intel Core 7 160HL 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 2933)
Larger memory bandwidth (83.2GB/s vs 45.8GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3.0)
Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 20MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (45W vs 65W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

May 2020
Release Date
Apr 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Comet Lake
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake-PS
i9-10900F
Processor Number
-
LGA-1200
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
N/A
Integrated Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
-
Generation
Core 7 (Raptor Lake-PS)

Package

14 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
45 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
-
Foundry
Intel

CPU Performance

10
Performance Cores
6
20
Performance Core Threads
12
2.8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
5.2 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
-
Efficiency Cores
8
-
Efficiency Core Threads
8
-
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1800 MHz
-
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
10
Total Core Count
14
20
Total Thread Count
20
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
28x
Multiplier
25.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
20 MB shared
L3 Cache
24 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2933
Memory Types
DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200
128 GB
Max Memory Size
96 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
45.8 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No

Miscellaneous

3.0
PCIe Version
4
16
PCIe Lanes
8

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy