Home Comparison Intel Core i9 13900 vs Intel Core i7 8700K

Intel Core i9 13900 vs Intel Core i7 8700K

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i9 13900 with 24 cores 2.0GHz and Intel Core i7 8700K with 6 cores 3.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i9 13900 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2666)
Larger memory bandwidth (89.6GB/s vs 41.6GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3.0)
Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 12MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (65W vs 95W)
Intel Core i7 8700K 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 2.0GHz)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core i9 13900 +80%
2190
Intel Core i7 8700K
1215
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core i9 13900 +309%
35774
Intel Core i7 8700K
8734
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core i9 13900 +103%
3006
Intel Core i7 8700K
1475
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core i9 13900 +200%
19064
Intel Core i7 8700K
6339
Blender
Intel Core i9 13900 +216%
493
Intel Core i7 8700K
156
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Core i9 13900 +71%
2111
Intel Core i7 8700K
1233
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Core i9 13900 +229%
21870
Intel Core i7 8700K
6632
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Core i9 13900 +57%
4339
Intel Core i7 8700K
2748
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Core i9 13900 +250%
47914
Intel Core i7 8700K
13661
VS

General Parameters

Jan 2023
Release Date
Oct 2017
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Raptor Lake
Core Architecture
Coffee Lake
i9-13900
Processor Number
i7-8700K
LGA-1700
Socket
LGA-1151
UHD Graphics 770
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 630

Package

10 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
95 W
219 W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
-
100°C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
6
16
Performance Core Threads
12
2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
5.2 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
16
Efficiency Cores
-
16
Efficiency Core Threads
-
1.5 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
4.2 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
24
Total Core Count
6
32
Total Thread Count
12
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
20x
Multiplier
37x
80 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
2 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
36 MB shared
L3 Cache
12 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
192 GB
Max Memory Size
128 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
89.6 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
41.6 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
350 MHz
1650 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1200 MHz
256
Shader Units
192
16
Texture Units
24
8
Raster Operation Units
3
32
Execution Units
24
15 W
Power Consumption
15 W
-
Max Resolution
4096x2304 - 60 Hz
0.78 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.38 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

5.0
PCIe Version
3.0
20
PCIe Lanes
16
-
Extended Instruction Set
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy