Intel Core Ultra 5 115U vs Apple M1

VS

Intel Core Ultra 5 115U Apple M1

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 5 115U with 8 cores 1.5GHz and Apple M1 with 8 cores 2.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 5 115U 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 1 months late

Higher specification of memory (LPDDR5X-7467 vs LPDDR4X-4266)

Larger memory bandwidth (120GB/s vs 68.25GB/s)

Apple M1 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 4)

Higher base frequency (2.1GHz vs 1.5GHz)

Lower TDP (14W vs 15W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core Ultra 5 115U

1616

Apple M1 +38%

2231

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core Ultra 5 115U

5338

Apple M1 +50%

8035

Intel Core Ultra 5 115U

VS

Apple M1

General Parameters

Dec 2023

Release Date

Nov 2020

Intel

Manufacturer

Apple

Laptop

Type

Laptop

-

Instruction Set

ARMv8

Meteor Lake

Core Architecture

Icestorm and Firestorm

Intel BGA 2049

Socket

Apple M-Socket

Arc Xe-LPG 48EU

Integrated Graphics

Apple M1 GPU

Ultra 5 (Meteor Lake)

Generation

-

Package

-

Transistor Count

16 billions

7 nm

Manufacturing Process

5 nm

Intel BGA 2049

Socket

Apple M-Socket

15 W

Power Consumption

14 W

Intel

Foundry

-

FC-BGA

Package

-

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

8

4

Performance Core Threads

8

1.5 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.1 GHz

4.2 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

3.2 GHz

6

Efficiency Cores

-

6

Efficiency Core Threads

-

1000 MHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

3.5 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

8

Total Core Count

8

10

Total Thread Count

8

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

-

15.0

Multiplier

-

112 KB per core

L1 Cache

192 K per core

2 MB per core

L2 Cache

12 MB shared

10 MB shared

L3 Cache

-

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

LPDDR5X-7467,DDR5-5600

Memory Types

LPDDR4X-4266

-

Max Memory Size

16 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

120 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

68.25 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

450 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1278 MHz

-

Shader Units

1024

-

Texture Units

64

-

Raster Operation Units

32

-

Execution Units

128

-

Power Consumption

15 W

-

Max Resolution

6016x3384 - 60 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

2.6 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Core Ultra 5 115U

Official Website

-

4

PCIe Version

4.0

12

PCIe Lanes

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core i7 14790F vs Intel Core Ultra 5 115U

2

Intel Core i5 1335U vs Intel Core Ultra 5 115U

3

Intel Core i7 1355U vs Intel Core Ultra 5 115U

4

Intel Core i5 12450H vs Intel Core Ultra 5 115U

5

Intel Core i9 13900H vs Intel Core Ultra 5 115U

6

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Intel Core Ultra 5 115U

7

Intel Core Ultra 5 115U vs AMD Ryzen 7 7735U

8

Apple M3 vs Apple M1

9

Intel Core Ultra 5 115U vs Intel Core i5 1155G7

10

Intel Core Ultra 5 115U vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

Related News

1

TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion

2

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

3

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

4

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

5

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

6

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

7

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

8

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

9

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

10

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD