Intel Core Ultra 5 240 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285T
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 5 240 with 10 cores 3.2GHz and Intel Core Ultra 9 285T with 24 cores 1.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core Ultra 5 240 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 1.4GHz)
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 24MB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
Score
General Parameters
Dec 2024
Release Date
Jan 2025
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Arrow Lake
Core Architecture
Arrow Lake-S
Intel Socket 1851
Socket
Intel Socket 1851
Integrated Graphics
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake)
Generation
Ultra 9 (Arrow Lake)
Package
-
Transistor Count
17.8 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
35 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
105°C
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
243 mm²
CPU Performance
6
Performance Cores
8
6
Performance Core Threads
16
3.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
5.2 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
4
Efficiency Cores
16
4
Efficiency Core Threads
16
1 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1200 MHz
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
10
Total Core Count
24
10
Total Thread Count
24
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
32
Multiplier
14.0
112 KB per core
L1 Cache
192 KB per core
23 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB per core
24 MB shared
L3 Cache
36 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR5-6400
256 GB
Max Memory Size
256 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Graphics Card Parameters
-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Base Frequency
600 MHz
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1800 MHz
-
Shader Units
512
-
Execution Units
4
-
Graphics Performance
1.79 TFLOPS
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
5
PCIe Lanes
20
