Intel Core Ultra 5 240 vs KaiXian KX 7000 8
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 5 240 with 10 cores 3.2GHz and KaiXian KX 7000 8 with 8 cores 3.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core Ultra 5 240 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 4800)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 76.8GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4.0)
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 3.0GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 7nm)
Lower TDP (65W vs 95W)
KaiXian KX 7000 8 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Larger L3 cache size (32MB vs 24MB)
Score
General Parameters
Dec 2024
Release Date
Dec 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
ZHAOXIN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Arrow Lake
Core Architecture
Century Avenue
-
Processor Number
KX-7000/8
Intel Socket 1851
Socket
LGA/BGA
Integrated Graphics
C-1190
Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake)
Generation
-
Package
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
95 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
-
CPU Performance
6
Performance Cores
8
6
Performance Core Threads
8
3.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.0 GHz
5.2 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
4
Efficiency Cores
0
4
Efficiency Core Threads
1 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
10
Total Core Count
8
10
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
32
Multiplier
30
112 KB per core
L1 Cache
-
23 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
24 MB shared
L3 Cache
32 MB
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
256 GB
Max Memory Size
128 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
Shader Units
-
Texture Units
-
Raster Operation Units
-
Execution Units
-
Power Consumption
-
Graphics Performance
0 TFLOPS
