Intel Core Ultra 7 258V vs Intel Celeron 6305

VS

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

Intel Celeron 6305

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V with 8 cores 2.2GHz and Intel Celeron 6305 with 2 cores 1.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V 's Advantages

Released 4 years late

Better graphics card performance

Higher specification of memory (8533 vs 3733)

Larger memory bandwidth (136GB/s vs 51.2GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3.0)

Higher base frequency (2.2GHz vs 1.8GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (12MB vs 4MB)

More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)

Intel Celeron 6305 's Advantages

Lower TDP (15W vs 37W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V +309%

2619

Intel Celeron 6305

640

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V +865%

10510

Intel Celeron 6305

1089

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

VS

Intel Celeron 6305

General Parameters

Sep 2024

Release Date

Sep 2020

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Lunar Lake

Core Architecture

Tiger Lake

258V

Processor Number

6305

FCBGA-2833

Socket

BGA-1449

Arc Graphics 140V

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48 EUs

Ultra 7 (Lunar Lake)

Generation

-

Package

3 nm

Manufacturing Process

10 nm

17-37 W

Power Consumption

15 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

TSMC

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

4

Performance Cores

2

4

Performance Core Threads

2

2.2 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

1.8 GHz

4.8 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

-

4

Efficiency Cores

-

4

Efficiency Core Threads

-

2.2 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

3.7 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

8

Total Core Count

2

8

Total Thread Count

2

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

22

Multiplier

18x

48 KB per core

L0 Cache

-

192 KB per core

L1 Cache

96 K per core

14 MB

L2 Cache

1256 K per core

12 MB

L3 Cache

4 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

LPDDR5X-8533

Memory Types

DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733

32 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

136 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

51.2 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

600 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

300 MHz

1950 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1250 MHz

1024

Shader Units

384

Texture Units

24

Raster Operation Units

12

8

Execution Units

48

Power Consumption

15 W

3.99 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

0.84 TFLOPS

AI Accelerator

Intel® AI Boost

NPU

-

47 TOPS

Theoretical performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

Official Website

Intel Celeron 6305

5.0

PCIe Version

3.0

8

PCIe Lanes

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V vs Intel Core i5 12450H

2

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V vs AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS

3

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V vs Intel Core i7 11800H

4

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V vs Intel Core i9 13900HX

5

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V vs Apple M4 10 Cores

6

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V vs Intel Core i5 6200U

7

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V vs Intel Core i7 7500U

8

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V vs AMD Ryzen 5 8640U

9

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V vs Intel Core i7 1255U

10

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V vs Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster